Skip to content

Conversation

@mmasciov
Copy link

@mmasciov mmasciov commented Feb 14, 2025

PR description:

As per title, and presented at TRK POG meeting on Feb. 11:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1498184/#56-mkfit-updates-for-phase-2

PR validation:

As presented at TRK POG meeting on Feb. 11:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1498184/#56-mkfit-updates-for-phase-2

In short: physics performance is ~ on par with CKF (default), while timing is reduced.

It requires PR cms-data/RecoTracker-MkFit#16 for results shown at TRK POG.

@mmasciov mmasciov closed this Feb 14, 2025
@mmasciov mmasciov reopened this Feb 14, 2025
from Configuration.Eras.Era_Phase2C10_dd4hep_cff import Phase2C10_dd4hep
from Configuration.Eras.ModifierChain_trackingMkFitProd_cff import trackingMkFitProdPhase2

Phase2C10_dd4hep_noMkFit = cms.ModifierChain(Phase2C10_dd4hep.copyAndExclude([trackingMkFitProdPhase2]))
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would've made a noMkFit only for the production detector setup. But I guess it wouldn't really hurt to have more.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am aware I probably overdid it, but I thought that overdoing was better than the other way around, to avoid potential objections, as indeed it shouldn't hurt to have more.

@mmasciov mmasciov closed this Feb 18, 2025
@mmasciov mmasciov reopened this Feb 18, 2025
@mmasciov
Copy link
Author

To central CMSSW: cms-sw#47383

@slava77 slava77 merged commit 38e3ea5 into master Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants